I call the gender debate a debate between life choices and
not just between pink or blue.
When we go to a shop we often find separate floors for
shopping based on gender. From the colour of the wall to the colour of the
merchandise we purchase, our conventionally accepted choices are so different
from how our opposite gender is showcased. We find a product in five different
colours but usually even this variety does not exceed the stereo-typically
accepted choices for the given gender. How does one define better taste when it
comes to colors, without compromising on unconventional individuality?
The society names you a girl and because you are named a
girl you are expected to develop the few girl-like qualities (which are again
decided by the society). If at all you do not grow up as the society termed you,
one is stamped as a spoilt brat. To me it seems like- you are a girl, you must
like pink, you must grow your hair, you must love cooking and taking care of all things in the
house. It is alright if it is a choice you make but limiting and if one is
catering to societal assumptions alone.
This is what standardising does- provide a cube and metal
boxes to fit in. It looks simple and considered normative but it is unfair when
one is trying to make sense of the complexity. The society is paired – Girl vs
boy , single vs committed, tall vs short, dark vs fair, working vs home maker
so on and so forth. Once you fall in a particular category you have no choice
but to start liking the traits that signify that category. Let this not happen
only because it is the norm.
The world offers multitudes of colors and choices and let us
not restrict ourselves because we are expected to satisfy the society. Let us
start satisfying ourselves first.